Adeline Kon/Utility Dive
The industry is growing increasingly comfortable with lithium-ion, but its limitations open up a space for other technologies to compete in the storage mix.
At least 32 utilities are aiming to be carbon-free or achieve net-zero emissions by 2050. This is the last of a four-part series exploring the storage technologies that could get them there.
Back in 2012 and 2013, when Morten Lund, a partner at the law firm Stoel Rives, first began dropping in at energy storage technology conferences, he came across a wide variety of technologies on display.
At the time, lithium-ion was thought to be too expensive, and so there was a lot of mechanical type-storage — pumped hydro and compressed air, for instance, and one technology based on localized compressed water that involved a vertical drill and deep reservoir. There were a number of technologies, Lund said, like the latter, that today are either gone or have become irrelevant.
"All of these things were being proposed almost as equal alternatives . . . it wasn’t a given at all that batteries were going to be the answer. It certainly wasn’t obvious that lithium-ion was going to be the answer," said Lund.
But fast forward a few years, and the electric utility industry is increasingly turning to battery storage. In 2010, seven battery storage projects amounted to 59 MW of power capacity in the country, according to a recent report from the U.S. Energy Information Administration. By the end of 2018, there were 869 MW of large-scale battery storage in operation in the country, reflecting 1,236 MWh of capacity. More than 90% were lithium-ion systems.
Lots of utilities are coming out with carbon goals, and renewables are going to play a big part in that, said Zachary Kuznar, managing director of energy storage, microgrid and CHP development at Duke Energy.
"As you put more and more solar and wind on the grid, the batteries are going to be, in my opinion, kind of an essential resource to help smooth out that intermittency," Kuznar said.
"But also, as we get more into some of these more long-duration technologies, like flow batteries and others, I think it’s going to be a critical piece to potentially offset the need to build some kind of future peaking plants."
The rapid growth of the battery storage sector has been driven predominantly by the electric vehicle industry, according to David Hart, professor and director of the Center for Science, Technology, and Innovation Policy at George Mason University’s Schar School of Policy and Government. The expansion of the EV industry over the last half decade, and the experience and scale of production that came with that, has played a significant role in driving down the unit cost of batteries, Hart said.
Part of the growth story has involved duration — when Hart first started researching energy storage four or five years ago, people thought batteries could provide one to three hours of storage. But now, four hours is standard and people are talking about six and eight hours as well.
"[There’s a] big gap between that and something seasonal. But for renewables integration, there are different scales — and definitely that daily scale is a big one, so if lithium-ion completely takes that over, that’s a big contribution," Hart said.
Utilities see ‘good terms and conditions’ with lithium-ion
Earlier this year, Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) filed a request with California regulators for approval to move ahead with five lithium-ion projects — amounting to 423 MW/1,692 MWh — scheduled to come online next August, bringing the total amount of storage the utility has under contract to more than 1 GW, representing more than 4 GWh of capacity. The projects were identified as part of a broader effort to address potential resource adequacy shortages in California’s electric system.
PG&E’s longer-term goals are aligned with California’s effort to decarbonize its electric system by 2045, according to Martin Wyspianski, senior director of energy portfolio procurement and policy at PG&E.
"As we’re trying to decarbonize or add renewables to the portfolio mix, we’re going to need to think about what technologies are there to support grid reliability," Wyspianski added — and that’s where batteries come in.
Developers are growing more comfortable with lithium-ion, which is the technology that’s predominantly bid into PG&E’s storage request for offers, according to Wyspianski.
Another utility that’s been eyeing storage deployments as a key part of its future resource mix is Hawaiian Electric, which faces the unique challenge of managing an island grid, meaning the utility can’t balance its system by importing power from an adjoining utility like its mainland counterparts, Colton Ching, senior vice president of planning and technology, said.
In September, Hawaiian Electric asked state regulators to approve seven solar-plus-storage project contracts, as well as a standalone storage contract in Oahu and Maui. The projects, which are scheduled to be completed in 2022 and 2023, amount to almost 2,000 MWh of storage.
Hawaiian Electric does not dictate which technologies it’s looking for when procuring storage resources, according to Ching — instead, the utility specifies storage requirements, like MWh capacity, ramping capability and so on.
"[A]nd in every case, the bids have been coming in as lithium-ion, because it’s such a dominant form right now in the commercial space," Ching said.
Duke Energy has also been deploying storage within its footprint for a variety of use cases, Kuznar said — to bolster areas that experience poor system reliability, as well as dealing with bulk system needs and providing frequency regulation.
"I would say most of our projects that we’ve deployed or are deploying right now… have been very focused on lithium-ion, just because from a commercial standpoint we can get very good terms and conditions there," said Kuznar.
Other chemistries look for their own niche
But some see downsides to lithium-ion batteries.
"[L]ithium-ion is inherently flawed and I for one can’t wait for a better technology to come along and take it down, because it’s just not good enough," Stoel Rives’ Lund said.
He likened lithium-ion batteries to "a delicate flower."
"With lithium-ion, you have the problem where how you use it affects its functionality; in the sense that if you keep running it up and down several times a day, it will degrade and wear out significantly faster than if you don’t," Lund said, adding that this makes it difficult to finance standalone utility-scale battery projects.
These challenges, as well as some of the durational limitations of lithium-ion, open up a space for other types of batteries to compete for room in the storage mix of the future — including zinc-air, which has the advantages of an easily available, competitively priced and non-flammable raw material, according to Ron MacDonald, president, CEO and director of Zinc8 Energy Solutions.
The entry point for Zinc8’s batteries is around eight hours of duration, said MacDonald — that’s the sweet spot at which it’s the most competitive in the market, except for perhaps a compressed air or pumped storage project.
"But we can install this anywhere, and you can’t do that with those other two technologies," MacDonald added.
Zinc air batteries are likely the only other battery technology that could compete with lithium-ion in some aspects, according to Todd Tolliver, senior manager of storage technologies at ICF. The technology is particularly attractive because it degrades at a much slower rate than current lithium-ion systems, which could, along with other factors, result in low operating costs — although Tolliver said this is yet to be proven.
Zinc air has been successful in remote or difficult-to-access places because it doesn´t require a lot of monitoring and can hold energy capacity over a longer period of time, Tolliver said.
Read the full article at the source:
Rockstone Disclaimer: This report contains forward-looking information or forward-looking statements (collectively "forward-looking information") within the meaning of applicable securities laws. Forward-looking information is typically identified by words such as: "believe", "expect", "anticipate", "intend", "estimate", "potentially" and similar expressions, or are those, which, by their nature, refer to future events. Rockstone Research, Zinc8 Energy Solutions Inc. and Zimtu Capital Corp. caution investors that any forward-looking information provided herein is not a guarantee of future results or performance, and that actual results may differ materially from those in forward-looking information as a result of various factors. The reader is referred to the Zinc8 Energy Solutions Inc.´s public filings for a more complete discussion of such risk factors and their potential effects which may be accessed through their profiles on SEDAR at www.sedar.com. Please read the full disclaimer within the full research report as a PDF (here) as fundamental risks and conflicts of interest exist. Zinc8 Energy Solutions Inc. pays Zimtu Capital Corp. to provide this report and other investor awareness services.The author, Stephan Bogner, holds a long position in Zinc8 Energy Solutions Inc. and is being paid by Zimtu Capital Corp. for the preparation and distribution of this report, whereas Zimtu Capital Corp. also holds a long position in Zinc8 Energy Solutions Inc.